there is also https://opentopomap.org, is this similar to what you need ?
regards m On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 4:06 PM, Lars Ahlzen <l...@ahlzen.com> wrote: > On 05/20/2016 10:58 PM, Richard Welty wrote: >> >> On 5/20/16 9:24 PM, Clifford Snow wrote: >>> >>> I was just on TopOSM [1] which appears to be very outdated. Does >>> anyone know who maintains this site? >>> >>> [1] http://toposm.ahlzen.com/ >> >> lars ahlzen maintains it. not sure if he's still monitoring this list >> closely or not. > > > I do. It's pretty out of date indeed. > > TopOSM was never rendered on-the-fly. It's just a (very large) set of static > tiles (currently hosted by Stamen). To update it I'd have to either > re-render and upload the entire set, or improve it until it can be rendered > in real time. I was working on the latter [1] but never quite finished it. > > There's already the OSM cycle map which has a lot of the same features, > though with a slightly different focus. I guess one advantage of something > like toposm is that it can use higher-resolution data from sources like > USGS, and uses US conventions for things like units, symbols and other > cartographic details. > > Would it be would be worth picking it up again? > > - Lars > > [1] https://github.com/Ahlzen/TopOSM2 > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-us mailing list > Talk-us@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us