On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 3:56 PM, Charlotte Wolter <techl...@techlady.com> wrote:
> Hello, > > Looks like, given Paul's information, that I just have to go in and > correct as many as I can. > This is an occasional issue with TIGER data. Somehow, when an > address is located at the end of a driveway, especially long driveways, > the driveway is given the street name. It may be a thing with TIGER > software. Having worked on the Census, I know they create streets by > marking a GPS point for every address. So, somehow the processing of > the information they get, driveways become streets. > I'll keep working on it. > I think that you are doing the wrong thing here. The data came from the Virgina to Census as is. It is not like the Census made a mistake here. That's how the jurisdiction maps their area. To remove the street names or the driveways is wrong for the area. I make my statements based on the prior version. Dave Hansen brought those driveways as the were. The bot-mode expanded a the names and removed moved a few Tiger tags. You'll have remove the names from a larger portion than just Rustburg. I don't think that you are being respectful of the local customs by imposing your jurisdictions customs on their area. Regards, Greg Morgan
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
