On 04/04/2017 10:00 AM, Albert Pundt wrote: > Recently somebody went around and bulk-"demoted" many northern NJ roads. > Granted, some of these were marked as trunk and primary that would > probably be better as primary and secondary, respectively, but this > person made various trunk routes secondary (including major arterials > such as US 206, NJ 15, US 46, NJ 31, etc. that should be no lower than > primary), primary routes tertiary, and demoted most if not all secondary > and tertiary routes to residential/unclassified. This seems like a way > overboard change. I started to fix the more obvious errors here, but it > seems like it would be way quicker and easier to revert the changeset > and start over with fewer and more conservative reclassifications. What > are your thoughts on this?
I'd lean towards reverting the entire changeset before it wipes out too much additional work to do so. Also leave the user who did this a polite but direct comment on the changeset that This Is Not Cool. -- Shawn K. Quinn <skqu...@rushpost.com> http://www.rantroulette.com http://www.skqrecordquest.com _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
