On 3/3/19 11:47 AM, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > I also don't make risky armchair edit in areas with active local mappers. > > --- > > Is "NYS GIS data" something that can be considered nearly error free? If > not then > it should not be used for edits without verification with at least > high-quality aerial imaged > and this mapper should be reminded about it. > > If yes then leaving geometry with note is a good idea.
it is certainly an area with an active local mapper (me) which can be seen easily by the removal of tiger:reviewed tags and by looking at edit histories. i have not reviewed NYS GIS data because there were, in the past at least, licensing issues. i do not know if those have been resolved so i'm not pitching a fit about that. it might be ok now. i just don't know. but from this edit, it appears that NYS GIS contains things that were wrong in 2007 when we took in the TIGER data. richard -- rwe...@averillpark.net Averill Park Networking - GIS & IT Consulting OpenStreetMap - PostgreSQL - Linux Java - Web Applications - Search _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
