On 3/3/19 1:06 PM, Andy Townsend wrote: > On 03/03/2019 16:09, Richard Welty wrote: >> what can/should we be doing about this sort of stuff? i'm really >> at a bit of a loss here. >> > Aside from the excellent technical suggestion that's already been made, > I'd suggest a polite changeset discussion comment, explaining that the > imagery that they're using there is out of date or wrong for some other > reason. > > Changeset discussion comments have an advantage over direct OSM messages > in that they are visible to all, which tends to mean that (a) everyone > is that much more nice to each other and (b) other mappers may know that > there is a potential problem. Also, if you get no reply and need to ask > the Data Working Group for help we can easily see the details of the > problem, without have to ask you to repeat what you've already sent in PMs.
> Andy (from the DWG) Good suggestion; i have added a changeset comment describing my concerns. a review of the bio of the mapper in question shows that he is not just an armchair mapper, he is a corporate armchair mapper. i don't know if that makes it better or worse. richard -- rwe...@averillpark.net Averill Park Networking - GIS & IT Consulting OpenStreetMap - PostgreSQL - Linux Java - Web Applications - Search _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us