Alright, I think we have a consensus forming. Someone want to update the wiki?
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 12:30 PM Evin Fairchild <evindf...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm also in favor of this change. It's a route number, so it only should > be in the ref tag. This will make Forest service roads more consistent with > other numbered routes. Even though most, if not all, Forest service roads > don't have a name but just a number, I still am in favor of this. I was a > bit surprised that the wiki was saying to keep the road number in the name. > > In fact, the names that most of these forest service roads have don't even > match common parlance. Most people refer to them as "Forest Service Road > XX" whereas the TIGER import called them "National Forest Development Road > XX," which might be the official name, but not the most common name. > > -Evin > > > On Wed, Jul 29, 2020, 6:47 AM Mike Thompson <miketh...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 1:33 PM Paul Johnson <ba...@ursamundi.org> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> Could we get the US Road Tagging page updated to reflect common name >>> practice instead of encouraging the duplication of the ref in the name? Or >>> is that going to spark drama? >>> >> I am in favor of the change. The name tag should be for the name only. >> >> Mike >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-us mailing list >> Talk-us@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us >> >
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
