On 31/08/2020 10.18, Mike Thompson wrote:
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 7:46 AM Matthew Woehlke wrote:
The objection is that access=private currently *has* an understood
meaning, and that meaning is *no* access without permission, not what
you described above.
Sounds like my driveway. If you are using my driveway without my
permission, either implicit (e.g. delivering a package) or explicit, I am
going to ask you to leave. I think you are conflating whether something is
"not allowed" with "can be prosecuted as a crime."
I think *you* are conflating implicit permission and explicit
permission. access=private as I understand the general community
consensus to be means no access without *explicit* permission. No access
without *implicit* permission is closer to access=destination... but
note I said "closer to". We don't seem to have something that exactly
means "no access except by *implied* permission".
--
Matthew
_______________________________________________
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us