Jon Burgess schrieb: > On Thu, 2007-12-20 at 13:41 +0100, Daniel Schmidt wrote: > >>> access=public/private/permissive are all listed on Map_Features, it >>> isn't clear whether permissive should imply a P symbol or not. The >>> code needs to handle the other cases too. >>> >> In my understanding, an example for a "permissive" car park would be a >> supermarket car park. It's a private car park which is publicly >> accessible and you don't have to ask anyone for permission to park. >> But you are only allowed to use this car park while shopping in that >> particular market. As the usage of this car park is somehow restricted >> I wouldn't display a 'P' symbol. >> >> The only case where I would place this symbol is when you are allowed >> to park your car and go whereever you want for a couple of hours. >> >> >> So: >> access=public => 'P' >> access=private => no 'P' >> access=permissive => no 'P' >> access=[anything else] => no 'P' >> no access => 'P' (as most of the current car parks in OSM are probably >> public ones but don't have an "access" tag) >> >> > > I've made the appropriate updates to the Mapnik osm2pgsql import code so > that it will only add the automatic 'P' symbol to a parking area if > there is no access= tag or if there is access=public. Any other > access=<something> tag will prevent a P being added. > > It will take a week or two before the effect of this change will appear > on the rendered maps. > > In addition I've added the access= key to the list of columns exported > to the PostgreSQL database so we can add further map styles to > differentiate other objects with access=<something> on the map. > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Approved_features/Parking Is it hard to change the mapnik-code to render also this approved parking-feature? That would be great :-)
-- mario _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
