On 19/03/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Which is as it should be. If an object originating from that import is > > significantly altered later, then it should be possible to reflect this in > > the source tag.
of course, defining 'significantly altered' becomes an issue maybe we can ignore it, and keep it as linz in perpetuity, no matter how much it changes? i don't see too many issues with this, and anyway, i would imagine only a small number would change enough to warrant complete removal? > That's a good question for their lawyers, do we have to maintain > attribution for data which is found to be incorrect and hence > corrected.... i'll put this point forward > Using another (write once) tag would still enable the original upload to > be recognized, even if the data is corrected at a later stage. yes, providing double-attribution - linz/some other data set originator and the last editor of the item > Thinking more on how osmarender places a copyright on one side of a way, > could the other sided be used for an 'attribution' tag? how much of an issue would it be to do this in mapnik as well? _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
