Andy Robinson (blackadder) wrote: > I clearly got it wrong, apologies for that. So the question is whether to > group them under a single definition or to split between funicular an > rack/cog.
I'd be all for splitting them under a separate key (railway:incline:type=funicular/cable/rack? I know I'll lose that particular key due to the namespace style, but hopefully people can agree with the general concept of splitting the values like that) I've written up a proposal here: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposed_features/Incline_railway This should allow the easy tagging of any sort of incline railway as well as keeping the existing TIGER data valid. It also uses the method I mention above to allow more precision if desired. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
