Andy Allan schrieb: > On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 9:02 PM, Alex Mauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Sven Geggus wrote: >> > >> > To be serious, I don't like this pseudo object-oriented >> > railway:incline:traction= stuff at all. >> >> Huh? object oriented? It's like that in order to prevent potential >> conflicts, not anything to do with object orientation. >> > Gah. All the namespacing appears to be there to raise the barrier to > entry, rather than solving any real problem. Once again, I will say > that it is unnecessarily complicated. If I find a traction=something I > will know that you are talking about railway traction because it is on > a railway=something object. In the same way, I will know that > capacity=100 means that it's a chairlift capacity because it's on a > chairlift, not a car park, and any "piste:thing:capacity" is a waste > of time. You are simply making the tagging extremely complicated to > remember. > > Please, please, please stop with the namespacing. We have tens of > thousands of volunteers who won't understand what it means, and it > doesn't actually solve any real problems. > FULL ACK!!!
Regards, ULFL _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
