On Saturday 29 March 2008 19:20:24 Alex Mauer wrote: > Andy Allan wrote: > > I see you've changed it from railway:incline:traction= to > > railway:traction= - but I still don't understand the need for the > > railway: prefix. Am I missing something obvious? What's wrong with > > just traction= ? > > I think it is possible, even likely, that we might want to apply it to > something other than railway, which can share a way with a railway. The > simple/plain traction= would preclude this.
There is nothing really special about the traction tag that makes it more likely that this will happen with it than with other tags. Take the name tag for example. If the railway shares a way object with something else, then does the name tag apply to the railway, to the other thing, to both? What if each of them has a different name? Almost nobody would accept it if we suddenly had to use railway:name=, highway:name=, etc. on all ways just because there are some places where people want to tag the street and the the tramway on the same way object. What you'd need is a solution that works for all tags, not a few tags with namespace parts and all the rest without. -- m.v.g., Cartinus _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
