Oh please, I wasn't talking about language. Lars Aronsson wrote: > Lambertus wrote: > >> Here the dogma 'Don't change the tagging just to get it >> rendered' applies :-) > > That is an absurd proposition. It could lead us to label them as > "vägklassning=riksväg ; vägbredd=9 meter ; hastighet=90 km/h" and > we should just ignore the fact that the map of Sweden doesn't get > rendered at all. I feel like I have been far too pragmatic in my > first three years of OpenStreetMap. > >> I think it would be better to judge the roads on what their >> function is and try to correlate those roads to the map features >> page by their description. > > It's all very easy. The function is "riksväg". > >> But this may well be that perhaps some ways in Sweden have to be >> reclassified to trunk or that some ways in Norway /Finland >> should be classified primary, I don't know that. > >> There is ofcourse also the chance that Sweden just does not have >> a road type that fits the trunk type between motorway and >> primary, however from what I read in other mails it appears that >> cyclists are allowed on most trunk roads in GB. > > There are non-motorway roads where tractors and bicycles are > disallowed. These are called "motortrafikled" (and "2+1 väg") but > they are not very common in Sweden. And I don't know if this road > type is ever indicated on printed maps. > > >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
