On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 10:34 PM, Christoph Böhme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > thanks for putting this proposal together, Rory! > > So far I followed the whole noname discussion quietly, but I am getting > the feeling that nobody is advocating what I think is the only clean > solution of the problem: Frederik's "ignore_test" suggestion.
I've needed noname two time in 3 years, that's not a lot. But if I had thought of tagging that as noname=yes then I think the world would have been a better place. And seriously I don't care if it's ignore_test=name, noname=true or name:absent=yes. All I care about is people documenting what they are tagging, people are tagging noname=true so why not document it. Maybe you see a great use for ignore_test=..... then document that if you are using it. Or show us someplace where it's used, if it really prove to be so superior we can easily put a #redirect [[Key:ignore_test]] on the noname=yes page. Have a nice one / Erik _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
