> The place for an "approved" tag which is not widely used is Approved > features, not Map Features.
That could be a solution. And I think that's where we need to go anyway as the map feature page is just too big. What you seams to propose here is keep "the good tags well in view" and the "bad tags hidden somewhere" I would agree with the idea, but what is bad or wrong ? Since it's hard to answer, it seams to be "in the air" that a used tag is good, and an unused tag is bad. But I don't agree with that. Arguments are on my other (rather too long) message PS: just for bad faith : So is GNU/linux bad right ? So is OSM bad right ? -- Sylvain Letuffe [EMAIL PROTECTED] qui suis-je : http://slyserv.dyndns.org _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
