jean-christophe.haessig wrote: > Moreover, after having read the proposed license text and some comments > on wiki pages, I am under the impression that most of the participants in > the discussion are public domain advocates and that they may use this > license change to promote their views.
Just to dispel any conspiracy theories: that certainly isn't true. Looking at the postings to legal-talk in March so far, I see contributions from three people I believe to be PD advocates (Frederik, Russ, me) and six from people I believe to be share-alike advocates (Simon, Peter, Rob, Oliver, Etienne, Ivan). I don't keep track of everyone's preferences - I'm not that creepy ;) - but you get the general idea. cheers Richard -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Concerns-about-ODbL-tp22287609p22287833.html Sent from the OpenStreetMap - Legal Talk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-t...@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
