On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 6:51 AM, Richard Fairhurst <rich...@systemed.net>wrote:
> > 80n wrote: > > I support Frederik's view that the community is the most valuable aspect > > of OSM. > > Um, I'm not arguing against that. All I'm disputing is this silly little > notion that maps automatically lose all value after a year or two. > Perhaps it's better to look at it the other way round. How much value does one map *gain* by being more up to date than another map? For some uses, like the street map at Charlbury railway station perhaps not a lot. For other uses, like how to route around the congestion charging zone in central London, there's a lot of value gained by being current. > > cheers > Richard > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/License-to-kill-tp22323485p22367102.html > Sent from the OpenStreetMap - Legal Talk mailing list archive at > Nabble.com. > > > _______________________________________________ > legal-talk mailing list > legal-t...@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk >
_______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-t...@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk