On 5 Mar 2009, at 16:27, Grant Slater wrote: > SteveC wrote: >> >>> A 'pure' OSM perspective should of course come from the OSMF >>> lawyer and I hope you/the 'licensing group' will be able to >>> explain some of the outstanding Use Cases to him so he can give an >>> opinion. Is that going to be possible within the consultation phase? >> >> I don't see why not - Grant add to the agenda and lets discuss. > > No problem, added to the agenda already yesterday. > > COMMUNITY HELP... Could I ask some guys to please go through the list > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Open_Data_License/Use_Cases > > And flag which one still require a response from the OSMF lawyer > including those that require extra explanation to the lawyer. > Peter Miller has also suggested on the talk page that some items > might be appropriate to merge.
I have been through all the use cases tightening them up now. Pretty much ready for some advice. Regards, Peter > > > Regards > Grant > _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
