--- On Tue, 28/7/09, David Earl <da...@frankieandshadow.com> wrote: > We can give ourselves a helping hand here if we keep > is_in. That's assuming the information contained in it is useful to begin with, as I keep stating the information I've seen is inconsistent so that's not helping any one. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
- Re: [OSM-talk] is_in and similar tags Shaun McDonald
- Re: [OSM-talk] is_in and similar tags andrzej zaborowski
- Re: [OSM-talk] is_in and similar tags John Smith
- Re: [OSM-talk] is_in and similar tags David Earl
- Re: [OSM-talk] is_in and similar tags Andy Allan
- Re: [OSM-talk] is_in and similar tags andrzej zaborowski
- Re: [OSM-talk] is_in and similar tags David Earl
- Re: [OSM-talk] is_in and similar tags Andy Allan
- Re: [OSM-talk] is_in and similar tags John Smith
- Re: [OSM-talk] is_in and similar tags John Smith
- Re: [OSM-talk] is_in and similar tags John Smith
- Re: [OSM-talk] is_in and similar tags andrzej zaborowski
- Re: [OSM-talk] is_in and similar tags John Smith
- Re: [OSM-talk] is_in and similar tags John Smith
- Re: [OSM-talk] is_in and similar tags John Smith
- Re: [OSM-talk] is_in and similar tags David Earl
- Re: [OSM-talk] is_in and similar tags John Smith
- Re: [OSM-talk] is_in and similar tags gary
- Re: [OSM-talk] is_in and similar tags John Smith
- Re: [OSM-talk] is_in and similar tags John Smith