--- On Tue, 28/7/09, andrzej zaborowski <balr...@gmail.com> wrote: > Data being wrong is a moot point, it doesn't speak for > either is_in > tags or boundary polygons and neither help make data more > correct > really. data being stored consistently is the point. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
- Re: [OSM-talk] is_in and similar tags andrzej zaborowski
- Re: [OSM-talk] is_in and similar tags David Earl
- Re: [OSM-talk] is_in and similar tags Andy Allan
- Re: [OSM-talk] is_in and similar tags John Smith
- Re: [OSM-talk] is_in and similar tags John Smith
- Re: [OSM-talk] is_in and similar tags John Smith
- Re: [OSM-talk] is_in and similar tags andrzej zaborowski
- Re: [OSM-talk] is_in and similar tags John Smith
- Re: [OSM-talk] is_in and similar tags John Smith
- Re: [OSM-talk] is_in and similar tags John Smith
- Re: [OSM-talk] is_in and similar tags David Earl
- Re: [OSM-talk] is_in and similar tags John Smith
- Re: [OSM-talk] is_in and similar tags gary
- Re: [OSM-talk] is_in and similar tags John Smith
- Re: [OSM-talk] is_in and similar tags John Smith
- Re: [OSM-talk] is_in and similar tags John Smith
- Re: [OSM-talk] is_in and similar tags andrzej zaborowski
- Re: [OSM-talk] is_in and similar tags John Smith