--- On Tue, 28/7/09, Andy Allan <gravityst...@gmail.com> wrote: > Let's stop the is_in debate - yes, they are useful to data > consumers, > no, they shouldn't be in OSM itself, and no, nobody has yet > stepped up > to sort it out. Ummmm.... I am stepping up to sort it out, at least for some parts of the world, I was just after a little direction on the subject... _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
- Re: [OSM-talk] is_in and similar tags Andy Allan
- Re: [OSM-talk] is_in and similar tags andrzej zaborowski
- Re: [OSM-talk] is_in and similar tags David Earl
- Re: [OSM-talk] is_in and similar tags Andy Allan
- Re: [OSM-talk] is_in and similar tags John Smith
- Re: [OSM-talk] is_in and similar tags John Smith
- Re: [OSM-talk] is_in and similar tags John Smith
- Re: [OSM-talk] is_in and similar tags andrzej zaborowski
- Re: [OSM-talk] is_in and similar tags John Smith
- Re: [OSM-talk] is_in and similar tags John Smith
- Re: [OSM-talk] is_in and similar tags John Smith
- Re: [OSM-talk] is_in and similar tags David Earl
- Re: [OSM-talk] is_in and similar tags John Smith
- Re: [OSM-talk] is_in and similar tags gary
- Re: [OSM-talk] is_in and similar tags John Smith
- Re: [OSM-talk] is_in and similar tags John Smith
- Re: [OSM-talk] is_in and similar tags John Smith
- Re: [OSM-talk] is_in and similar tags andrzej zaborowski
- Re: [OSM-talk] is_in and similar tags John Smith