On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 12:00 PM, John Smith<delta_foxt...@yahoo.com> wrote: > --- On Wed, 29/7/09, Aun Johnsen (via Webmail) <skipp...@gimnechiske.org> > wrote: > >> I have made a proposal for a tag .... > I think this will only serve to confuse, no where on the maxheight wiki link > you provided does it say it's a legal restriction, if anything it's exactly > the same thing you're just giving people the option of picking tags so half > the system will have maxheight used, and half will have clearance and the > routing software will end up with twice the work for no benefit.
True, maxheight currently does not specify the reason. So the question is, is there a need to differentiate between different "kinds" of maxheight? Surely this issue has come up before in relation to other keys? If there is in fact a need to differentiate, what's the most common practice? For example, "maxheight:physical=*" and "maxheight:legal=*"? Just throwing ideas around, but you would first need to demonstrate that "maxheight" is not sufficient. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
