On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 10:41:11 +0000 (GMT), John Smith <delta_foxt...@yahoo.com> wrote: > --- On Thu, 30/7/09, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> actually even though the definition in the wiki might not >> specify it >> unambigously and explicitly the current use of maxheight > > These things should be explicitly stated, otherwise people interpret it > differently :) > >> (as discussed >> intensively at least on German ML) should be > > That doesn't help anyone else not on that list. > >> maxheight:legal, so I >> would encourage to put it the other way round: >> maxheight >> and >> maxheight:physical > > Either way, expanding the existing tag makes more sense than creating 2 > differently named tags which will cause even more confusion and > duplication. Either somebody make it clear how ALL usages of maxheight are to be used, wether legal, physical, marine, or any other special interest usage, or I will continue on my proposal. Without any clearification on the existing tag, than it will be more confusing than adding new tags. I have atleast stated in the definition of the tag how it is to be used. -- Brgds Aun Johnsen via Webmail
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
