Re: [OSM-talk] [tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Clearance

[John Smith]

--- On Thu, 30/7/09, Aun Johnsen (via Webmail) <skipp...@gimnechiske.org> wrote:

> will continue on my proposal. Without any clearification on
> the existing
> tag, than it will be more confusing than adding new tags. I
> have atleast
> stated in the definition of the tag how it is to be used.

No, 2 completely differently named tags will make things much worst, not any 
better. It's clear how free form strings quickly become completely inconsistent 
with one another, see my emails on the is_in tag, 5 different suburbs of Sydney 
ended up with completely different values.


      

_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk