On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 10:59 AM, John Smith<delta_foxt...@yahoo.com> wrote: > I agree with everything else you wrote except width since I really don't want > to get a tape measure out and measure widths of roads, using lanes=* to > estimate widths would be more sensible and is already in use. +1
I prefere to add "narrow=yes" combined with residential or unclassified (or any other) highways. It should be interpreted as "between 75% to 50% narrower than the default width of this highway type". Pieren _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
