2009/8/25 Mike Harris <mik...@googlemail.com>: > I just tried to apply the 'architects' convention' of steps 'always' being > from bottom to top. Then for unrelated reasons I reversed the way. Unlike > 'oneway' this does not reverse the direction of the steps - i.e. the software > doesn't know about the architects' convention. So I have to conclude that - > at present at least - the assumption of an implicit sense is risky.
yes, I know it is risky. I wanted to write this convention to the wiki some time ago, but then a discussion on talk-de started, why it could be more "natural"/"logical" to do it the other way round, and in the end no conclusion could be achieved. It is just a convention, all architects know about it. It has IMHO nothing to do with logics or nature. cheers, Martin _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
