Hi > 1.) with great power comes great responsibility! We'll have to distribute this responsibility to many shoulders and do it crowdsourced.
> 2.) the number of votes should depend on the complexity (number of > affected objects?) that's cool.. > 3.) mailing lists might be flooded because every single (and simple) > revert request is sent to a complete list - of course I don't know how > many reverts might be requested per time How about some kind of community within this tool, excluding the mailinglist or including it after 10% of the needed votes are done. We could have some lists like "recent revert-requests", "revert requests with the lowest number of votes" to get people to vote for them. > generally it's an idea worth thinking about it because right now only a > few people are able to conduct such complex operations properly and that's not compatible with the osm approach of allowing anybody to commit data, from the nerd to the dau *) Peter *) sorry for that, i don't know how "Lischen Müller" is called in english ;) _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk