-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Frederik Ramm schreef: > And there's a review in Dutch by an "Internet lawyer" of which I cannot > say whether it's good or bad: > > http://blog.iusmentis.com/2009/07/15/open-source-databanken-de-opendatabanklicentie-versie-10
I can... before Arnoud already pointed out that factual information doesn't contain any copyright. Only the stylesheet that create a map is the creative work, that might include the software to do so. What he points out is that in a legal case in NL between an ISP and a spam-company that the owner, here the ISP, has a contractual right to limit the usage of the resources. Now the ODbL licence is actually targeting a third person. So not the publisher (OSM), not the user (2nd party) but the visitor of the user. And he claims this can be a very interesting case... because the 2nd party might actually have accepted the ODbL, but his visitor did not, can a visitor therefore be held to the ODbL contract... Stefan -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEAREKAAYFAksbDtQACgkQYH1+F2Rqwn1grQCfUei564SVD8GtPlIDSo4BrjJe mP0AmgPdHoLcQWNQO5sgESAkY65G0TJF =Rdem -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
