On Dec 5, 2009, at 21:52, Stefan de Konink <ste...@konink.de> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA512 > > SteveC schreef: >> Of course they said that, they only support PD-like licenses *as a >> policy*. > > What a non-sense, every academic works with attribution of past work. > Including attribution in testsets and data being available. >
It's nonsense but that's their direction. > You are getting a bit narrow minded in the direction you want to go. Me? What? > > > ...and I still don't understand why we can't offer layers of data with > any license that is on that layer. If people do prefer CC0/PD or in > the > other extreme -NC they can just edit on there. Case solved, everyone > happy. > > > Stefan > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ > > iEYEAREKAAYFAksbOIYACgkQYH1+F2Rqwn3y6ACePMl3wjOJAnANHcs2NRzsNjix > ZWgAn1eUP4162kz7wI+4/Qt9DAYft6TB > =NKz8 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
