Hi!
Kai Krueger wrote: > > Even if promoting to the company did not work, it might still be worth > promoting OSM in the media coverage / blogs of the Nav4All shutdown as a > reason why it is important to have free and open map data to prevent > anti-competitive activities by a few large companies. > I am fully aware that many people will not want to hear that - but why promote something that OSM cannot deliver? I can understand why Nav4All will rather shutdown than attempt to switch to OSM. A while ago, I had approached another company which produces mobile navigation software, where I know some people. I tried to advertise OSM data and maybe get some support for their software. To my great surprise, they had spent a considerable sum of money on converting OSM data into their format and had already evaluated it. The result of the evaluation was disillusioning: The geometry is pretty good, but the attribution is way below what would be required to substitute the commercial data. They decided to not use it, in spite of the work already invested. Which is rather close to the statement from Nav4All. OSM is quite suitable for any hobby project, but I believe that the anarchistic nature and the often controversial and sometimes disputed and chaotic tagging are reason enough to deter the use of OSM in any professional area where you are talking about warranties. The commercial map data has fixed tagging schemes and minimum quality standards. It contains no nasty surprises in general and if it does fail in some places, there's a provider who is liable to fix this ASAP. As long as OSM has no comparable standards (and I don't expect it will have - I'd like to point at my favorite example that there's still no agreed way to tag something as simple as a bicycle way), it is unlikely to meet the existing standards of commercial providers. I am aware that other than Nav4All and the company I talked to, Skobbler is trying to switch to OSM. They are probably running into all the problems with ambiguities and controversial tagging right now. So I am very interested what sort of navigation they will manage. bye Nop -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Fwd-Nav4All-navigation-shut-down-by-Navteq-tp4488024p4494366.html Sent from the General Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk