On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 6:05 PM, Apollinaris Schoell <ascho...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 27 Feb 2010, at 14:33 , Nathan Edgars II wrote: >> And a week from now half the ways in the changeset will probably have >> been edited, making a restoration very complicated. Is it the intent >> here that those with the technical know-how to revert can make a >> "first strike", leaving others unable to act? > > but if the first strike can also leave others unable to act. If there is no > obvious wrong doing you need to provide more and better explanations why your > edits are good and the revert is bad. > for me it's not clear without spending a lot of time comparing your edits > with previous versions. explain what you did and why and it's more likely > someone is willing to do it.
I fail to see how reverting with no explanation and then not responding when asked is not "obvious wrong doing". As for what I did, I explained in a previous post - I fixed up the routings of the numbered highways. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
