2010/3/30 Cédric MOULLET <cedric.moul...@gmail.com>: > Hi, > It's not Cédric's project, but the project of a community (composed of > individuals, companies and universities) initiated in 2007 ;-) (see press > release: > http://code.google.com/p/openaddresses/wiki/Release_BETA_PressRelease#EN:_OpenAddresses_.org,_a_community_web_site_for_the_management). > But, I still can answer.
Dear Cédric, OpenAdresses is an interesting idea as a simpler interface for address data. The intent to synchronize the data with OSM makes sense. The current situation with OSM data cc-by-sa and OpenAddresses data cc-by seems broken. Shouldn't the licenses be synchronized so that the data can be synchronized? OpenAddresses is failing the share-alike obligation. Do you understand that some will see that as a serious problem. This issue will persist when OSM upgrades to the ODbL license. Can you bring this problem to the attention of the OpenAddresses community and resolve it? _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
