On 30 March 2010 16:13, Richard Weait <rich...@weait.com> wrote: > 2010/3/30 Cédric MOULLET <cedric.moul...@gmail.com>: > > Hi, > > It's not Cédric's project, but the project of a community (composed of > > individuals, companies and universities) initiated in 2007 ;-) (see press > > release: > > > http://code.google.com/p/openaddresses/wiki/Release_BETA_PressRelease#EN:_OpenAddresses_.org,_a_community_web_site_for_the_management > ). > > But, I still can answer. > > Dear Cédric, > > OpenAdresses is an interesting idea as a simpler interface for address > data. The intent to synchronize the data with OSM makes sense. > > The current situation with OSM data cc-by-sa and OpenAddresses data > cc-by seems broken. Shouldn't the licenses be synchronized so that > the data can be synchronized? > > OpenAddresses is failing the share-alike obligation. Do you > understand that some will see that as a serious problem. This issue > will persist when OSM upgrades to the ODbL license. > > Can you bring this problem to the attention of the OpenAddresses > community and resolve it? > > Hello,
Cedric has replied on the French mailing list. He is aware of the licence issue and he is going to be changing the licence to be compatible with OSM. I am sure it will happen very soon as he is very responsive. Emilie Laffray
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
