On 20 July 2010 16:55, Frederik Ramm <frede...@remote.org> wrote: > The contributor terms are linked to the license change question and cannot > be viewed in isolation.
Why not? It seems like a fairly arbitrary decision to force them to be linked... > I would also like to draw attention to the fact that OSMF members - among > them, I believe, yourself - have approved the process, including the current > version of the contributor terms, with a 89% majority in December last year. I believe this is the point Steve keeps pointing out, there was no direct consequences at the time, and people were assuming there is still outs later if problems were discovered and up until that point the emphasis was strongly on the new license, I don't recall much being said about the new terms until recently, at which point people were concluding that the new CTs were not going to be compatible with data imports already in the system let alone new imports. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
