On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 08:55:17AM +0200, Frederik Ramm wrote: > I would also like to draw attention to the fact that OSMF members - > among them, I believe, yourself - have approved the process, > including the current version of the contributor terms, with a 89% > majority in December last year. You weren't vocal on the contributor > terms in the months before so I am somewhat surprised that you're > starting to voice your disagreement half a year after the vote. Of > course anyone can have second thoughts - but remember that any > change to the contributor terms would require repeating that OSMF > member vote.
I approved the process for the license change and somehow managed to miss the contributor terms. I wasn’t aware of them when I voted, my mistake, although may be I could have been made more aware—someone else appeared to think the CTs “snuck” in quietly too. I took a look in the December archives for osmf-talk: http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/osmf-talk/2009-December/000670.html On legal-talk some days before, I said I had already responded to the polls: http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/2009-December/003029.html I’m quite surprised how much I have *not* changed my opinions. Simon -- A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that works.—John Gall
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk