On 20 July 2010 19:07, Frederik Ramm <frede...@remote.org> wrote: > I don't share your sentiment that providing a license change path for the > future actually throws away any good work. If the new license works well for
Then what do you call it when most of the data for Australia would be incompatible, along with any other potential sources of data the government releases under cc-by? I would call this throwing away good work that people spent a lot of time and effort on. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
