On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 4:07 PM, Frederik Ramm <frede...@remote.org> wrote: > There are many places in the world where we have the "second-best" data in > OSM because the best available data is not under a suitable license.
Might those places follow patterns like this: Germany 230 people per km^2 UK 250 people per km^2 Kibera 200k people per km^2 Or like this: Australia 2 people per km^2 Sweden 21 people per km^2 Just one thing, _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk