On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Frederik Ramm <frede...@remote.org> wrote: > Hi, > > On 08/08/2010 04:39 PM, Anthony wrote: >> >> If the license change is important, why don't the people who want the >> license change make their own coastline, on the dev server. This can >> be done quickly, right? *Then* you can delete the import, and replace >> it with the one on the dev server. > > I have no problem with that; the PGS coastline is probably even there in the > data history and needs only to be retrieved. > > In fact, this is exactly what I said I would do
So do it. > For > some reason John Smith does not seem to share our view that this is a > reasonable thing to do! I don't think it's a reasonable thing to do either. I think you're wasting your time. But it's your time. > I think this could be a way forward for all those who fear data loss; we > switch to ODbL but continue to publish the planet under CC-BY-SA, containig > all the non-relicensed data, until such time that enough CC-BY-SA data has > been replaced by ODbL data. I'm sure that, given the proper tools, we'd be > there in a matter of months. And I'm sure if you do it that way you'll be infringing on the copyright of the CC-BY-SA data. No, what I said is that you need to start from a blank map. If you want to create a map which isn't CC-BY-SA, you aren't allowed to use the CC-BY-SA map to do it. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
