On 10 August 2010 19:25, Dave F. <[email protected]> wrote: > On 10/08/2010 19:13, SteveC wrote: > >> Interesting statistics: >> >> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Aude/osmtalk >> > > What does that prove? > > verbosity *doesn't* equate to disruption. > > +1
I don't find John/Frederik/Anthony/etc. to be in the slightest bit poisonous. If you are not interested in what they have to say then don't read their postings. It is the lack of finality with the license change that is the problem. Random people have posted that everything is decided and the horse has bolted as far as changes go. If that is the case the lets have that confirmed and clarify once and for all whether data sources such as the OS/Nearmap/etc. are compatible with the new license and terms. Then we can all decide if we stick with osm or not. Kevin
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
