Wouldn't that only be used on the section of the path that actually has the steps, however? I am wondering how (or if) you would tag the entire path to indicate that you can, legally, use a bicycle or motorcycle on it, but it isn't well-suited to such use. Another reason that you might want to tag a path in such a manner would be if it had stepping-stones across a stream, rather than a bridge.
-------Original Email------- Subject :Re: [OSM-talk] Tagging Scheme Recommendations: highway=path, footway, trail? >From :mailto:dieterdre...@gmail.com Date :Thu Aug 26 14:59:01 America/Chicago 2010 2010/8/26 John F. Eldredge <j...@jfeldredge.com>: > What additional tag would one use to state that a particular path is not > advisable for vehicular use (for instance, because it contains steps at one > or more points), but doesn't have a sign forbidding vehicular use? this is not to solve by "additional" tags, but with highway=steps cheers, Martin -- John F. Eldredge -- j...@jfeldredge.com "Reserve your right to think, for even to think wrongly is better than not to think at all." -- Hypatia of Alexandria _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
