On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 19:45:48 +0000 Tom Hughes <t...@compton.nu> wrote:
> On 10/02/11 19:37, Elizabeth Dodd wrote: > > > Let's get this completely fair, and remove all the work of others > > who have been caught tracing from Google, admitted it when > > challenged, and only the work which was challenged has been > > removed. Work which may also be traced from Google because it also > > was a long way from the person's home, and not been specifically > > challenged, is still there in the OSM database. > > If such edits are reported then they will be removed, just as these > ones were. > > If you know of other cases then how about you stop dropping opaque > hints here and start acting like a good OSM citizen by following the > proper protocols and reporting it. See the bold text on this page: > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Copyright_infringement > > Where possible only infringing edits will be removed - I'm not sure > why you think we would or should do more than that. In this case the > mapper refused to cooperate with identifying which edits were > infringing so we had to assume they all were and remove them all. > > Tom > I have sent Tom an email with clear details. I feel like I am picking on one mapper just because I have crossed paths with that one mapper's edits and investigated what has been done, and as I have explained to Tom, I have suspicions about further changesets. I have certainly firm evidence against this mapper for a number of changesets, where my physical path has crossed with edits which contain completely unverifiable material. Liz _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
