Frederik Ramm wrote: > > Assuming that Nearmap-derived data is indeed not compatible with the > future OSM license, I fail to understand how contributing data that will > later be deleted is a "privilege". > (a) the license change is not a certainty (b) the OSM instance run by OSMF is not the only project using the data (including the last cc-by-sa dump if the license does change)
Frederik Ramm wrote: > > I will not discuss this issue further on the talk list, as it is a topic > for legal-talk and will only annoy those on talk who are not interested > in legal matters. I fail to see how discussion of the future of the project doesn't belong on this list. -- View this message in context: http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/Licensing-Working-Group-tp6199509p6203454.html Sent from the General Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
