On Sat, 16 Apr 2011 00:29:29 +0100 Dermot McNally <[email protected]> wrote:
> This licence change now gives every mapper the means of undermining > the map through withholding of their own data, once freely given and > now very likely a foundation of data created by other mappers, also in > good faith. I understand that many mappers feel they _can't_ relicense > some or all of their work, and that's a really tough situation. But > mappers who just plain _won't_ agree to leave their data in, even > though there is no legal obstacle to it, should strongly consider > whether they are being true to the community they claim to be a part > of. Please consider the corollary to this Why does the ODbL faction not start with a fork of ODbL compliant data? Why do they need to force a split of the existing CC-by-SA data? _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
