Ed Avis wrote: > What's not clear is how the ODbL+DbCL licence would help this > situation. It would at least straightforwardly permit the publishing > of map tiles without any attribution or share-alike requirement
Disagree. (This has been gone over ad nauseam on legal-talk, I'm just pointing it out here for the record.) Richard -- View this message in context: http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/OpenStreetMap-License-Change-Phase-3-Pre-Announcement-tp6266295p6281939.html Sent from the General Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
