On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 09:22:22 -0700 (PDT) Richard Fairhurst <rich...@systemed.net> wrote:
> > To answer my own question - I guess that 'reasonably calculated to > > make...' suggests you should include an attribution notice and ask > > downstream users to respect it - although it doesn't mandate any > > particular choice of licence. So we would still have the > > attribution requirement as now. > > That's also my understanding (but that one's been hashed out on > talk-gb ad tediosum). So the new licence is not clear to a majority of mappers concerning these points - derived works, produced works, need for attribution. So why are adopting something that we don't understand? _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
