Tom Hughes writes: > On 07/06/11 08:41, Frederik Ramm wrote: > > > But before I do all that, I would like to hear from the community at > > large - you - whether you share my view. Do you agree that airspace > > should be elsewhere but not in OSM? > > +100
It should go on http://openairspace.org, which would be edited using JOSM, with mapnik tiles as a background layer. The only real disadvantage is that there would be no database-level connection between the end of the runway and the beginning of the airspace. I wonder ... what about tagging the node at the end of the runway in OSM with a pointer to the node number on OAS.org? And vice-versa. It would be straightforward to do a merge of the two databases if/when you needed to treat them as one. Or you could just follow them as if they were a symlink. You could do the same thing with subway lines and pipelines. But there I go, reinventing layers. Maybe we finally need them? -- --my blog is at http://blog.russnelson.com Crynwr supports open source software 521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315-600-8815 Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | Sheepdog _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk