On 24 June 2011 02:00, Tobias Knerr <o...@tobias-knerr.de> wrote: > There are two plausible legal interpretations: > - the "original author" is "OpenStreetMap" > - the "original author" are a lot of individuals
You left off companies that have donated data. > No matter which interpretation you choose, your website does not provide > the legally required attribution for either interpretation. Well, OSM-F may facilitate, but they didn't create the data, and I don't plan to bother listing 1,000s of individual authors either. > I'm not interested in talking about OSMF's legal choices with you. Oh so it's a case of do as I say, not as I do... _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
