On 31 August 2011 15:43, Russ Nelson <nel...@crynwr.com> wrote:
> John Smith writes:
>  > On 31 August 2011 10:19, Ian Sergeant <iserg...@hih.com.au> wrote:
>  > >
>  > > I think the strategy to remove all non-CT compliant data in one big bang 
> is
>  >
>  > What about the people that agreed to the CTs that had data compatible
>  > with the current license, cc-by-sa ?
>
> What about the people who didn't agree to the CT, but whose data is in
> the public domain?

Exactly, accepting or not accepting the CT might be a suitable
indicator for the majority of mappers, but it won't tell you if the
data is suitable for relicensing, lots of people have been told they
can accept the CTs because they allow for accepting the current
license.

_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Reply via email to