On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 8:14 AM, 80n <80n...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Anthony <o...@inbox.org> wrote: >> >> Furthermore, the goal is not to have a CT-clean database. You already >> have a CT-clean database. The goal, apparently, is to have an >> ODbL-clean database. >> > I think you mean a CT-clean contributor-base. Much of the database content > is un-infected by the CTs.
What I mean is that the database is compatible with the CTs, as the CTs allow the database to be released under CC-BY-SA. Alternatively put, the CTs do not require any content to be removed. Licensing the database under the ODbL *would* require content to be removed. But the CTs do not require this. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
