On Mon, 02 Jan 2012 15:47:15 +0000 Lester Caine <les...@lsces.co.uk> wrote:
> The only question that still has not been addressed is one that covers a lot > of > parallel data. SHOULD it be uploaded to the main database, or should we have > a > working method for linking secondary databases into the rendering process. > Which > to my mind still provides the most logical way forward. But at what point > does > an historic element get degraded to the secondary storage area? Or more > important ... what classifies historic data as being 'main stream'? > Historic data is 'main stream' when it is still visible in the landscape and becomes secondary when it stops being visible, for example a Tudor Manor House that has been wholly swallowed by a later mansion would be a target for the secondary stream but its Coach House that was remodelled, leaving its Tudor Heritage visible in the facade would remain in the main stream. MY OPINION FROM A GLANCE AND A GUESS AT THE RULES mick _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
